Topic: Great stuff from Bhollenegg ... (Read 177 times)

6, 12:30 AM EST

Msg. 432509 of 432523
(This msg. is a reply to 432383 by hundredtoone9.)
Jump to msg. #

Hundretoone9..Totally agree. Most of us spend an enormous amount of time, anchored to the computer, surfing the net for current information that will give us a fleeting glimpse of what to expect. The gurus provided confidence before revocation and kept a lot of shareholders from sailing away before the lock-in sealed the fate of all involved, the good and the knot so good. Timelines and amounts are fluid and predictions will continue to flow. I harbor no ill feelings toward the gurus when the predicted dates float on by because they are the messengers, not the source.At times it is difficult and overwhelming trying to navigate through the sea of information provided on board. There is a reason why a lot of money is being shelled out to keep the onslaught of bashers coming in wave after wave, day in, day out. A lot is at stake. This is GIGANTIC for Bona fide Stockholders and TITANIC for Illegal Shorts. I will definitely treasure the moment of the final wave. ..Good Bye for Naked Shorts and Good Buy for Bona fide Stockholders. All the best in wealth and healthStill STRONG,BOBbing aLONG,BHollenegg

By: bhollenegg

19 Nov 2006, 02:46 AM EST
Msg. 432518 of 432523
(This msg. is a reply to 432511 by jonas.grumby.ccxxxiv.)

Jump to msg. # No short of any kind??? Here is a letter from Jefferies admitting they did not realize they sold over 111 billion shares of CMKX because of a software glitch. It took them over 6 months to report the glitch after they found the problem. Two shorts...naked short, and short memory.

http://www.cmkxownersgroup.com/JefferiesLetter.pdf

« Last Edit: Today at 6:36am by bikinipro »
Link to Post - Back to Top Logged
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------bhollenegg
DIAMOND DIGGER
Member Info Status: offline
Joined: Oct 2006 P
osts: 30 Karma: 7

Contact Icons
Re: By Bhollenegg
« Reply #1 on Today at 12:19pm »
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Thank you Bikinipro for posting my message here...very much appreciated. I would like to share another message, which concerns CMKM revocation. Take care and all the best.
BHollenegg

Warlockiller, in reply to your question, “true... but that does not explain .0001, and revocation... on what grounds was that revocation again? LOL ”

CMKM Diamonds requested to be revoked as annotated in the S.E.C. Public Document in the link provided below, end of first paragraph“It is appropriate to grant CMKM Diamonds’’ request”…..Jonathan G. Katz

http://www.sec.gov/litigation/aljdec/34-52694.pdf

Now, why would the Secretary of the S.E.C., Jonathan Katz, who also wrote “The Final Rule” concerning naked shorting, and Donald Stoecklein, CMKM Diamonds’ Legal Counsel, who contributed his services to Jonathan Katz in providing information for “The Final Rule”, have anything to do with a “pink stock” trading at .0001 cents, billions of shares a day before revocation? Strange, every time I read this document, my eyes “STING”.

Anybody else experience this strange phenomenon?
Take care,BHollenegg
Link to Post - Back to Top
Logged islandtime
DIAMOND DIGGER