Claims Lapse List

Pedro's Claims Lapse list:

http://www.investorshub.com/boards/read_msg.asp?message_id=7701923

Claims Lapse List

Pedro's DD on claims list:

http://www.investorshub.com/boards/read_msg.asp?message_id=7701923

Bill Frizzell on NSS

Joined: May 2005 Gender: Male Posts: 4,862 Location: Over Here Frizzell Quotes From the Past-- Aloha Joe From Rb « Thread Started on Today at 10:26am » -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- By: aloha_joe2 28 Oct 2006, 11:38 PM EDT Msg. 414492 of 414651 Jump to msg. # Many people are again asking about the naked short issue. What is the true naked short? I do not know what the true naked short position is because the brokers have failed to respond to my requests for short positions from them. I have sent out at least 10 certified letters on behalf of you as shareholders to the 10 largest brokerage houses. I have not received the courtesy of a reply from one single brokerage house. I have sued the SEC to get the fails to deliver information but have not been successful in obtaining that info from the SEC. We have examined 11 or 12 thousand shareholder statements and have totaled over 400 billion shares. We know there are nearly 60 thousand shareholders according to the NOBO/OBO list. This would suggest to me quite a few more shares in the market place than the admitted 703 billion shares. ~ Frizzell By: aloha_joe2 28 Oct 2006, 11:42 PM EDT Msg. 414498 of 414653 Jump to msg. # I have received a partial response from the SEC on my requests for information for the Fails to Deliver in CMKX stock. I appreciate the SEC's response but their response is incomplete at best. I plan to continue my work to get you all the information the SEC has regarding the reported fails. It appears that approximately 800 Million shares of CMKX stock were reported to the DTCC as delivery failures in the month of April of 2005. My request for the SHO reports was limited to April of '05 in hopes that I could begin to start obtaining information without meeting resistance because my requests were "overly broad". ~ Frizzell By: aloha_joe2 28 Oct 2006, 11:43 PM EDT Msg. 414499 of 414653 Jump to msg. # There are many factors which I believe have brought us to this point in the saga of CMKX. Without engaging in a lengthy discussion of all such factors, there is no question in my mind that this stock has been manipulated by the third parties for quite a while. I remind you of the Jefferies letter that was uncovered in the administrative hearing. The SEC has resisted giving us proof of massive fails to deliver in this company until coincidentally a final revocation order was entered. ~ Frizzell By: aloha_joe2 28 Oct 2006, 11:47 PM EDT Msg. 414504 of 414653 Jump to msg. # CMKX stock seemed to be a poster child for this illegal trading technique. Now how does this trading technique catch up to the wrongdoers. I have heard that occasionally short sellers get caught with fails on their books and they have to go into the market and buy stock to close out their position. Since it works to the short sellers advantage by causing the stock to go down when they naked short a stock, it should work in the opposite direction to cause a stock price to go up when the stock is hard to find because of their short selling techniques. Many people bought this stock because of this possibility. How does the market correct itself? First, it must become apparent that a naked short exists. We must prove beyond a “shadow of doubt” that more shares have been sold into the stock market than was issued by the company. Although the SEC, the DTCC, the NASD, and most Broker/Dealers know the daily positions on this stock, current law does not provide for the company to acquire this information through simple requests. Company stock comes from the transfer agent. Legitimate shares are all backed by certificates issued by the transfer agent. We know the stock market allows brokers to sell stock even if they do not own it. Now, we must solve the mystery of how much real stock has been sold and how much stock has been sold that was not based on certs issued by the transfer agent. ~ Frizzell - - - - - By: aloha_joe2 28 Oct 2006, 11:48 PM EDT Msg. 414506 of 414653 Jump to msg. # This summer, we tallied 12,000 shareholder statements and documented 400 billion shares of stock. This did not include cert holders. We know there are approximately 60,000 shareholders based only on the figures given to us by ADP and the transfer agent. There appears to be many more! Combined, the NOBO/OBO list plus the cert list even proved a short in and of themselves of over 50 billion shares, and this did not include the billions of shares traded that were not reported through the DTCC and it did not include most Canadian brokerage holdings or other foreign accounts. ~ Frizzell By: aloha_joe2 28 Oct 2006, 11:56 PM EDT Msg. 414512 of 414653 Jump to msg. # The DTCC has been communicating with representatives of the Task Force for several weeks. It has been apparent to me that the DTCC is encouraging its participants to withdraw their certs from deposit at the DTCC. The participants are the thousands of broker/dealers, banks and clearing firms that use the services of the DTCC. As I understand the process, the participants are being asked to send the DTCC WT’s (withdrawal by transfer instructions) so the DTCC can then forward that participant’s respective cert (or holdings) to the transfer agent for change into the name of the beneficial owner. The DTCC would then not have a depository position as to the shares represented by this transfer request. There have been DTCC participants (broker/dealers, banks and clearing firms) that for some reason have either refused or neglected to order WT’s of their positions even though such action has been clearly called for since November of 2005. The original deadline by CMKM for shareholders to obtain their certs was December 31, 2005 as mentioned in this letter from the DTCC. We had been seeing correspondence between the DTCC and various broker/dealers for several months noting that the DTCC was requesting that its participants obtain certs per the requests of CMKM. Several firms complied promptly to the directions of the DTCC and now have no security position in CMKM at the DTCC. This directive dated April 5, 2006 was prepared by the DTCC officials as an internal memo to its participants. It is apparent that the DTCC wished to allow its participants the option to voluntarily request withdrawal of their certs by April 14, 2006. It is equally apparent that the DTCC is telling its participants that if any respective participant does not withdraw all CMKM certs on deposit or request that the DTCC transfer the participant’s certs to the Transfer Agent, then the DTCC will perform this task for the participant. We have received many inquiries regarding the meaning of this directive from the DTCC. The letter is self explanatory. By May 15, 2006, the DTCC will have no CMKM on deposit if the acts set out in this letter occur. What does this mean to the participants? Once the DTCC forwards all certs to the transfer agent or its participants, the beneficial owners and customers of the participants must look exclusively to their respective broker for their cert. The brokers can no longer blame the DTCC or the Transfer Agent for any failure to provide a cert to its customers. ~ Frizzell By: aloha_joe2 29 Oct 2006, 12:45 AM EDT Msg. 414536 of 414653 Jump to msg. # Frizzell law firm: we proved NSS in this company a long time ago: Sept 30, 2005 Greetings Group Members, I have received several emails of late inquiring about our naked short investigation. We have continued to tally shares by people that have sent their statements to us but the numbers are not changing significantly. We proved a huge naked short position in this company a long time ago. Our documentation substantiates 482 billion shares (approximately) owned by 11557 shareholders. This does not include cert holders. There remains approximately 48000 shareholders that have not sent us their holdings. By my estimates there are at least a trillion and a half shares that have been sold in CMKX stock. When all shares (including foreign and obo accounts) are added to the mix, the total could exceed two trillion shares. Have a good weekend. Onward, Bill http://ragingbull.quote.com/mboard/memalias.cgi?board=CMKI&member=aloha_

Frizzell law firm - we proved NSS in this company a long time ago

Sept 30, 2005


Greetings Group Members,

I have received several emails of late inquiring about our naked short investigation. We have continued to tally shares by people that have sent their statements to us but the numbers are not changing significantly. We proved a huge naked short position in this company a long time ago. Our documentation substantiates 482 billion shares (approximately) owned by 11557 shareholders. This does not include cert holders. There remains approximately 48000 shareholders that have not sent us their holdings. By my estimates there are at least a trillion and a half shares that have been sold in CMKX stock. When all shares (including foreign and obo accounts) are added to the mix, the total could exceed two trillion shares.

Have a good weekend.

Onward,

Bill